Conversations on religious faith keep cropping up at work. Is this good or bad? More than anything, I believe it has a tincture of danger.
Krylon and Colleen were my co-blathers. Colleen was born Ukrainian Orthodox, but converted to Catholicism to marry her husband, Joe. Her and Joe promised his parents they would baptize and confirm their children, which they did. At this point, Alex is a Notre Dame graduate and atheist, Rob is a quasi-practicing Catholic. Up until this year, Colleen gave chocolate up for lent (apparently every year) and faithfully gets her ashes on
that Wednesday. She doesn't do lent now because she's, "too old to care."
(I really should give Krylon a new alias but I'm so enjoying this moniker. Maybe I'll change it to Esther, her sister's name. Okay, you twisted my arm.) Esther, formerly known as Krylon (though I reserve the right to reclaim) is Protestant-Methodist. Her kids were baptized and confirmed, after which she left their spiritual journeys to them. This is where the conversation gets interesting.
Esther has obviously seen that I am currently reading:
The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason by Sam Harris; and currently have the following documentaries checked out:
Conversations with Richard Dawkins: The Four Horsemen (Episode 1), God on Trial: Dinesh D'Souza vs. Christopher Hitchens, and
Does God Exist?: Christopher Hitchens vs. William Lane Craig. She offered to me a paperback series (I wish I could remember the name) that in essence, is historical fiction based on the bible and, "really helped [her] nail down the timeline of the bible." I was thinking,
so, historical fiction based on historical fiction? That's some kind of meta! The volume she showed me featured King David and some mesopotamian tramp who were obviously drawn in the overly made up 1980s...
Alas, you do not say these things due to the ominous fragility of the attitude of the faithful. Plus, I just got to work, I'm not picking a fight. Plus plus, remaining open to my co-workers faithful anecdotes and ruminations help me understand where they're coming from and what points of view are out there. I want to hear
allllll the versions of the story. I'm lucky in this regard, I work with: Polish Orthodox, Ukrainian Orthodox, Catholics, a Muslim, Methodists, Born-Agains, New Agers, potential atheists, agnostics and half-hearted Christian moderates.
So back to Esther Krylon. Krylon can be her last name. Here are some snippets of Esther's views:
- It's all blind faith... There's no proof [of God], you just have to have faith. I mean, there's no recipe or formula or equation to give you God, or prove He exists. That's what people can't get their mind around.
- You know, Protestant, Methodist, Catholic, Christian, none of that matters! It doesn't matter because when the Revelation comes, all you have to do is accept Jesus Christ as your lord and savior, and really mean it in your heart... I mean, it could be a split-second decision or a lifelong decision. You can't bet on it, you have to mean it.
In everything she said, I could see that she truly cleaved to these thoughts and beliefs. As usual with the faithful, when it's apparent that I'm secular and have not been indoctrinated into any faith, the glances become piteous, pompous, wishful. If only I could see it their way. How could I have missed that crucial step of childhood training? "Who are the wolves that raised me and where is my twelve gauge?" Esther exhibited the pity portion of that list. This type of unwelcome pity used to upset me. Now, I reply with wonder. I feel it and I act with it. What else can I do?